Saturday, July 26, 2014

This Just Read: A Farewell to Arms

A few days ago I finished Ernest Hemingway's A Farewell to Arms. It's part of my summer of World War One centennial reading. I could have sworn that I'd read it decades years ago, when I first discovered Hemingway in college, but I may be wrong. Either way, I read a handful of Papa's works every few years and delight in rediscovering them. [WARNING: contains spoilers]

More than many authors for me, I get more out of Hemingway's stuff as I re-read it later in life. There's plenty there to meet me at whatever age or place in life I find myself. This isn't true of every author. I love The Hobbit, for example, and delight in re-reading it, but I don't often encounter new things in it the way I do with Hemingway. I guess that's as good a definition of "literature" as can be found.

So, whether I'd read it years ago and forgot, or read it for the first time this summer, I can say that I was deeply moved by A Farewell to Arms (hence AFTA). I've read quite a bit of Hemingway history and criticism, including Carlos Baker's biography. I know the real-life circumstances behind some of the plot of AFTA. I also know this is a young Hemingway coming to grips with his own story in ways to which The Sun Also Rises--no matter how autobiographical--never comes close. Not by a mile.

So this is a serious work. It's a story of war, of love, of loss. By the time EH wrote it, he'd had some taste of all of these. By the time of my recent reading, I'd had a decent grounding in two of them. I'm willing to let EH's instincts as a writer and storyteller inform me of the third.

I'm writing neither a review nor a book report, just some of my impressions. Let me share a few of the things I really liked and one I really didn't.

As a statement about war, I like what Hemingway's done. The book is one big ode to the futility of war. The war has already begin before the fist page and isn't over when we get to the last. That leaves this reader is a sense of permanent war. This is a feeling expressed by many of the characters, as well. There's a sense of exhaustion and helplessness throughout.

Though set against the backdrop of battle and death, there are only a few depictions of actual warfare perpetrated on by by the characters. An Italian sergeant is shot at and killed by the main character as he abandons them during a retreat. One of the ambulance drivers is shot and killed by his own side while wandering between enemy lines. Later, groups of officers are pulled aside during a general retreat and systematically shot for abandoning their men.

What's telling is that all the warfare that's actually depicted in the novel is done by and to members of the same side. The Austrians--and later the Germans--are there in the background, but mostly it's Italians killing Italians. It's as if Hemingway is giving us a not-so-subtle clue to the true nature of war: everyone ends up killing themselves.

Key to the main plot is the pregnancy of Catherine Barkley by the protagonist, Frederic Henry. Her child is stillborn and Catherine dies of hemorrhage, leaving Frederic alone at the close of the book. This pregnancy can be instilled with many great and portentous readings. What do we hope is being born out of the sacrifice of war? What brave new world are we expecting to emerge? Whatever hopes we might have had--of a life free from fear, of a world free of violence--are shattered as the pregnancy bears no living offspring and, in fact, kills the mother. A powerful metaphor for the nihilism of war.

The Sun Also Rises (TSAR), Hemingway's popular first novel, was an ensemble piece, following a groups of folks around Spain. AFTA is a more private work. Most of the conversations are one-on-one. Where TSAR can be catty and mean-spirited, AFTA is intimate. Lots of conversations occur in empty hospital rooms, hotel rooms, and restaurants (their emptiness another echo of war). This is generally done well and suits the purpose of the book. But there is a problem.

In their pillow talk, Catherine Barkley comes off as some sort of mewling imbecile. I don't know if women used to talk like that in the 1920s or if Hemingway hadn't had enough experiences of real women. Catherine is a needy, whiny girlfriend. There's a touch of the crazy bunny boiler from Fatal Attraction in her. I spent some time wondering what Frederic saw in her. Maybe she had qualities that don't come across fully in print [nudge nudge, wink wink]. Every other conversation is tight and well-written, classic Hemingway stuff. She comes off vain and shallow.

I know there are reasons for her characterization, stemming from Hemingway's own wartime experiences. Still, he clearly was writing his heart out here with great purpose. He should have done better by his characters.

Still, I highly recommend A Farewell to Arms and consider it one of Ernest Hemingway's best.

Sunday, July 13, 2014

This Just Read: The Guns of August

This summer marks the 100th anniversary of the outbreak of the First World War. To honor that event, I've been doing some associated reading.

This week I finished Barbara Tuchman's classic, The Guns of August, one of her three volumes on the history of the First World War. This volume deals with the immediate run-up to the war and the critical first thirty days, when Germany's drive through Belgium into France was designed to rapidly overwhelm French defenses, bringing the country to its knees in time for Germany to turn its attention to Russia.

I've been reading this for over a month, on my lunch hours, etc... It's well written, but not a page turner. I ran into the same problem a few years ago with John Keegan's The First World War. I think Keegan is one of the best military historians and love his books The Second World War and Six Armies in Normandy. Both Keegan's and Tuchman's approach to the First World War, however, is a step-by-step account of every move and counter-move. It gets a bit tedious and pretty soon you stop even trying to remember which general is which.

Some things I got out of Tuchman's book about underlying causes were the deeply-held conviction in Germany that war was a Good Thing, something that builds national character. Often commented upon as a causative factor was the interlocking web of treaties between nations at the turn of the century, committing them to wars if allies are attacked. France had to play her cards just right to make sure Germany violated all the right treaties (e.g. smashing through neutral Belgium) in order to lock in the actions of Russian and Great Britain. France did, indeed, play all those cards just right, though with supreme effort.

It's often said that the Second World War had its roots in the First. Well, apparently the First World War had its roots in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870. So much of the high commands of France and Germany were influenced by the events of 1870 and their war plans were crafted accordingly.

It makes one wonder how the wars of today are already influencing the wars of tomorrow. In this day of fast-paced Instant History, what formerly took decades can now happen in months or weeks. The swift attacks by ISIS in Syria and Iraq sprang full-blown from the US-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. I'm sure more will follow.

I'm currently reading A Farewell to Arms, by Ernest Hemingway, and may then read All Quiet on the Western Front, by Erich Remarque.

This Just Read: Get Their Name

I'm running a bit behind on my book postings. A few weeks ago I read a book for church called Get Their Name: How to Grow Your Church by Building New Relationships, by Bob Farr, Doug Anderson, and Kay Kotar. It's a book about relational evangelism--sharing the good news through personal relationships.

Overall, it's a good book and reads quickly. It's divided into three short sections about: 1) teaching your church members to share their faith stories, 2) how to engage people and begin to form new relationships, and 3) church hospitality.

I read the first section at the Utica Coffee Roasting Company, my favorite hangout in Utica. It read quickly and got me pretty excited. I thought, "I'd love all my church leaders to read this!" It presents an ordered and accessible model for teaching your church members to begin sharing their stories.

The second section was OK, but struck me as a little contrived. It presented tips on how to initiate spontaneous, authentic conversations with strangers. Note: If you have to provide tips, it's neither spontaneous nor authentic.

The third section on hospitality was good. Nothing earth-shattering, but well-written and useful to local churches, without being overwhelming. I'm going to adopt some of their suggestions.

Overall, as good book. Readable and useful to local churches.