Wednesday, February 20, 2008

Sad Birthday

I heard on the radio this morning that today is Kurt Cobain's birthday. Thinking about him always takes me back to the early nineties. David and I were living and working at Trinity College, in Hartford, Connecticut. Our friends were all college students and we got to hear quite a bit of college music from our neighbors (football-playing frat guys). I liked Nirvana at the time, one of the first music phenomena I was with when it was actually popular. I liked the whole college/alternative music scene of the early nineties, actually.


I remember when Kurt Cobain died. It wasn't a where-were-you-when-JFK-was-shot moment, but I remember hearing the news and seeing the effects. My friend Amina was devastated; I watched her cry as she stared at the cover of Rolling Stone (above) that week. Perhaps that's what gets me when I think about Cobain, how his death hurt those around me. He was a gifted songwriter and musician in a great band. I can't say that he was the modern Mozart or the next Elvis, maybe he was just the canary in the coal mine. All I can say is that when I think about him, it makes me sad.

As a Christian, I struggle with the suffering in the world. More than anything, I hate Easy Answers that overlook the harsh realities of life (or, worse, blame those realities on the people who suffer them). One of my least favorite is "God never gives us things we can't handle." I think this is a kind of wishful thinking, an expression of how we hope God will treat us, but I can point to countless example of people who were given more than they could handle, people who bent and broke beneath the load.

A convenient [un]Christian response is to blame the victim, to say that a person simply didn't have enough faith (or perhaps not the right kind of faith). While there are times that this might be true, it's heartless to think that everyone who has ever been overcome by despair lacks the faith to see it through. Men and women of sincere faith can and have been driven to the edge and beyond by life, and perhaps by God.

Nor is it helpful to look at Cobain's life and death as nothing more than tragic vanity (this is what I may have done at the time). On the surface, his inability to cope with fame and the insane expectations of American consumer culture seemed like just another Counter-Culture Pose. An eternal optimist, it's too easy for me to dismiss such pain as self-induced. It's too easy to say, "Cheer up, stupid! Life getting you down? Change it!" Such Can-Do platitudes ignore complexities, they also ignore the realities of genuine mental illness. Worse than ignore, they place the blame for them squarely on the shoulders of those who suffer from them.

While I'm hesitant to make a messiah out of Cobain, I'm not afraid to ask the daring question: Did he die for us? I can't help but see his death as a warning to all of us against the invasive effects of consumerism and greed. We're all subject to the same ambitions our culture presses on us. We chase after success, wealth, power, and influence at the same time our subconscious is telling us to run away. We are in the exact place where Jesus was, when he was tempted in the desert. When offered the chance to be powerful, influential and important, as he was, we want to say "Yes!" But the true path leads us downward, not upward. We're meant to head towards humility and selflessness, until the only thing left is love. This is True Power.

Do we have the courage to say "No" to the enticements of the world? How are we to think of those who say "Yes?" What about those, like Kurt Cobain, who are caught between the two choices? Ultimately, his death may be a warning to all of us. Whatever else it was, is and may yet be, his death was a tragedy for his friends, his family and for me. Not because of who we has, but because:
No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main. If a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as well as if a manor of thy friend's or of thine own were: any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee. (John Donne, Meditation XVII)
That's what's on my mind this morning. Love to all.

Back from Vacation! Whew!

We got home last night from a week in Virginia. We spent the week hanging our with friends, doing some home repair at my Mom's place, and eating out! It was pretty exhausting. We took Baby, our dog. We had to give her doggie drugs for the long car rides, but she seemed to enjoy the trip.

At my Mom's we removed a bathroom sink/vanity, then relocated a sink from another bathroom and replaced it with a new sink. Lots of annoying work in very tight spaces with me flat on my back on tile floors. In the end, all sinks were working and fully installed. They look pretty good.

For my next vacation, I need to go somewhere without distractions and do nothing. I'd like to visit Yosemite National Park one day; I think that could be a good vacation. We discussed with friends a trip to Nova Scotia as our next group vacation. I have an old programming friend who lives in Halifax and he has always told me how nice it is.

I also want to try to do a bit of camping this year (we went to REI, which always inspires me). Nothing dramatic, maybe just some nights at our local NY State Park, Stony Brook. It could be good practice for future vacationing. I haven't been camping properly since I was a kid.

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Cardiology

This past Sunday, I sat in on my church's adult Sunday School. The passage we read was the Anointing of David by Samuel (1 Samuel 16:1-13). This is a fabulous text and it sparked good conversation. As we were talking, I thought about the perplexing issue of David. God chose the young shepherd as the replacement for Saul, the king who had been chosen by the people. David and Saul are often held up as example of good and bad. The actual text, however, is less black-and-white.

David is not perfect. He is an adulterer and murderer, who uses his God-given position and authority to cause the death of his mistress' husband, Uriah. Saul, likewise, isn't all bad. As God's favor turns away from him, I can't help but feel sorry for him. He is earnest in his desire to rule well. Comparing to David's transgressions to Saul's, it's sometimes hard to tell who's the good king and who's the bad king.

Yet David is special. He is "a man after God's own heart" (1 Sam 13:14). This "heart" talk is repeated in chapter 16, when God tells Samuel that men and women "look on the outward appearance, but the Lord looks on the heart" (1 Sam 16:7). The heart is important to God. Something in David's heart appeals to him, while something in Saul's does not. It might be as simple as that. As were were discussing the text, the image of the cardiologist--the heart doctor--came to me. God is the Divine Cardiologist.

As the Cardiologist, he's interested in our heart health. Are we exercising it enough? How do we exercise our hearts? Walking, cycling and running are good for our hearts, but God is looking deeper. We must work out by loving more, caring more, feeling more for those we see (and those who we'll never see). Compassion is the exercise of the heart that the Divine Cardiologist prescribes. Quite simply, we must become more like Christ in the way we think, feel, and act. We must conform our heart to His. It's quite a workout. It gets easier the more we do it (like most exercise), but it never becomes automatic. We must always choose.

The right author (e.g. Maxine Dunham) could probably write a devotional book or short-term Bible study on God-as-Cardiologist. I'm probably not that guy. Who knows?

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

This Week's Lectionary

I've got some meaty choices this Sunday, and I want to choose early in the week, rather than later. I'm attending an all-day conference on Youth Ministry at Houghton College on Thursday, and would like to have the reading locked down before that. The big choice is between the Gospel and Epistle readings.

The Gospel reading is Matthew 4:12-23, which tells the story of the calling of the first disciples. The Epistle reading is First Corinthians 1:10-18, an exhortation to unity among the believers in Corinth. Both are great stories.

The Isaiah reading (Isaiah 9:1-4) brings a bit of confusion, especially when paired with the Matthew reading. The versification is unclear here. In most modern Bibles, Isaiah 9:1 doesn't seem to flow into 9:2. The text seems to change gears between the verses. In fact, the Hebrew Bible and Septuagint both number 9:1 as 8:23, tacking it on to the preceding chapter. This makes better sense as I read it, though it's still not crystal clear. How the modern Bibles got the verses changed can probably be traced (as so many things can) to the Latin Vulgate Bible. Saint Jerome labels the Hebrew Isaiah 8:23 as 9:1, and most modern (post-Vulgate) Bibles cleave to the versification of the Vulgate. Why Jerome deviates from the Hebrew and Septuagint numbering is beyond me.

Anyhoo, this is more than just an interesting [to me, at least] detour in textual criticism. The Matthew passage (Matthew 4:12-23) cites the Isaiah text. Matthew's citations (where they can be identified) are universally from the Septuagint. In this case, he connects verses 8:23 (the modern 9:1) and 9:1 (the modern 9:2). Modern readers with modern verse numbers will find these two verses connected (9:1-2) in their Bibles and not blink an eye. The author of the first gospel, however, would have to explicitly make the connection between verses in two hard-to-connect chapters (8:23 and 9:1).

I'm generally underwhelmed by the author of Matthew's use of Scripture, and this citation is a perfect example. While I admire his excellent use of Typological Prophecy in some of his citations, he often seems to be straining to connect the story of Jesus with the stories of the Hebrew Bible. Many of these connections don't seem to make sense at first (or second) glance. The connection cited in Matthew 4 between the lands of Zebulun & Naphtali and the coming of the great light in the darkness is forced, at best. The only connection in the base reading of the text seems to be the fact that the verses are adjacent. Hardly a deep, theological connection.

Because of this textual confusion and the less-then-clear connection between the verses cited, I'm leaning towards the First Corinthians passage. I'm not afraid to tackle tough textual issues, I just wonder if the best place to do it is a ten-minute sermon. I suspect it would leave people uninspired, not to mentioned confused and perhaps annoyed.

The Psalm for this week is great (Psalm 27), but the lectionary does it's standard hatchet job on it. They suggest reading verses 1 and 4-9. I hate it when they do this. What did poor verses 2 and 3 do? They mention evildoers and enemies, strife and calamity. Without those two verses, we get a watered-down Happy Sunshine poem of praise! It's the curse of the Easy Answer all over again (I need to write an essay on the Easy Answer and the huge problems it causes). Ah well... Maybe I need to preach on the Easy Answer this week? Hmmmm...

Sunday, January 20, 2008

Quiet Sunday Morning

This is my favorite time of the week. I'm in my church office, overlooking the Sanctuary. I've come in quite early to prepare for this morning's worship, but now all my preparations are complete. I've got some time to just sit here and think.

I'm nor preaching this Sunday, which is odd. The retired pastor from our community, Rev. Howard Warriner, is preaching the story of the Good Samaritan. I'll be leading worship, doing everything I normally do except preach. It give me different things to think about this morning. I'm also doing special music today, singing If I Had a Hammer for/with the congregation. It's a great song for Human Relations Day (which is today, in the United Methodist Church).

We got a dusting of snow yesterday, with a bit more coming in the next few days. Nothing dramatic, but it looks nice.

Friday, January 11, 2008

New Day Off

This week I started taking Thursday off. My previous day off was Monday, but I changed to to match Kristen's work schedule. It was pretty great. I didn't go anywhere or do anything. I took a nap on our spare bed, which has a delightful high-density foam mattress. It was delicious. I hope to have a more meaningful post soon.

Sunday, January 6, 2008

Two Kings!

I'm preaching this morning about the Magi, or Wise Men, from Matthew 2. Last night I was reading the New Interpreter's Bible and an idea struck me. The author of the NIB Matthew section, M. Eugene Boring, writes about the problems caused when the Magi come to Herod, the "king of Judea" and ask him where the "new" king was to be found. Herod was understandably upset. Who was this new king and why hadn't Herod heard about him before this?

The commentary goes on to nicely contrast the two kings and the two kingdoms that will be played against each other throughout Matthew's gospel. Herod's realm is an earthly one, Jesus' is much more than that. Despite this, the threat to the established order (Herod's) is quite real.

When reading this, my mind was cast back to the fall of 2000, when I took Intro to the Old Testament under Dr. Stephen Cook at VTS. I wrote a paper on First Samuel 16, where the Lord instructs Samuel to go to Bethlehem, to the house of Jesse, and anoint one of his sons. This is a radical act. Anointing is what you do to kings, and there already is a king in Israel: Saul! The two texts both contrast two kings and two kindgoms. In the Samuel story, God has grown disappointed with Saul and has decided to select as a new king someone after His own heart. Davis is this new king, but he is anointed as a child, while Saul still sits on the throne. Fortunately for David, his anointing is kept secret while he grows up and eventually ends up in Saul's court. Still, the tension between Saul and David begins soon after they meet ("Saul has killed his thousands and David his tens of thousands!") and continues throughout their lives, soon erupting into violence.

Anyhoo, I'm NOT preaching on this parallel story, but I wanted to write it down before I forgot it!